KOMENTAR
ditembusi oleh banyak objek kelajuan tinggi
banyak banyak banyak
perkataan banyak ialah kunci
kalau ditembak oleh peluru berpandu
hanya ledakan bukan banyak tembusan
kalau banyak tembusan
ertinya banyak tembakan
menunjukkan banyak tembakan didinding
kalau tembakan ertinya
saheh berita dari kicauan carlos
yang berkata: ada dua jet pejuang ukraine
mengekori mh17
KUALA LUMPUR 9 Sept. - Laporan awal siasatan tragedi pesawat Malaysia Airlines (MAS) MH17 yang ditembak jatuh di timur Ukraine, menunjukkan pesawat itu ditembusi banyak 'objek berkelajuan tinggi' semasa... 16:09:55
---------
Bro TT,
BalasPadamAmerika guna dron Global Hawk tembak misil udara ke udara yang boleh dilepaskan dari jarak 180 km ke arah MH 17. Jenis misil tu mungkin jenis meletup sebelum impak dengan menggunakan letupan peluru tabur. Mungkin jet Ukraine tu cuma samaran nak tutup jejak US kalau terjadi apa-apa nanti. Apepun ia kesan hentaman dari tepi bukan dari bawah oleh misil BUK dengan menuduh Russia sebagai dalangnya. Memang US yang untung. Boleh baca kat blog cipan.
Pesawat MH17 yg sedang terbang laju merempuh hujan batu.
BalasPadamsah mh17 ditembak dari udara ke udara,bkn peluru berpandu BUK seperti yg disangka,
BalasPadamjangan lupa...
BalasPadamada berita pas pis pus, orang sinun kata 2 bijik jet penyerang mengekori kapaterbang ni sebelum terhempas.......
jet penyerang sapa turrrr?
makin nampak sikit jelas dah...
berita baru tersebar dari wikilick yg memintas isyarat morsi dari area 51 menyatakan dengan jelas bahwa mh17 bukan dilanggar hujan batu dalam kelajuan tinggi sebaliknya hasil ujian cold fusion di makmal kimia genetik bio-sintesis bahan, didapati mh17 sebenarnya dilanggar "beratus partikel2 plutonium angkasa" atau lebih popular sebagai kryptonite dalam komik superman dan kumpulan saintis terbabit dalam ujian kimia itu menyifatkannya sebagai "agak kelakar" atau bengong
BalasPadamFlight MH17 left Amsterdam’s Schipol airport just after 10.30am, bound for Kuala Lumpur. Its flight plan had been approved by all of the relevant air traffic control agencies, including Ukraine’s, which is a member of Eurocontrol, which coordinates all flights across Europe.
BalasPadamBy 12.53pm the flight was in voice contact with controllers at Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, known as Dnipro Control. In compliance with the flight plan, the 777 was at 33,000 feet. The controllers were concerned about “separation conflict” with another 777 at the same altitude, also flying east and approaching from behind.
The controllers asked Flight 17 to climb to 35,000 to increase the safety margin. The Malaysian crew said they could not comply—the report gives no reason for what was very likely a fateful decision. (The distance from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur is more than 6,000 miles. The range of the 777 is 7,200 miles, and so when Flight 17 left Amsterdam its gas tanks would have been fully loaded and the weight would have restricted its ability to climb into the increasingly thinner air of higher altitudes. Nonetheless, after flying for well over two hours enough of this fuel should have been burned off to climb another 2,000 feet.)
The Ukrainian controllers assented to this and, instead, instructed the other 777, a Signapore Airlines flight from Copenhagen to Singapore, to go to 35,000 feet, which it did.
Shortly afterward the Malaysian pilot requested to make a course change, 20 miles to the left, to avoid weather. There was an outbreak of thunderstorms in the area, and some of the thunderheads topped out at 34,000 feet. Again, the Ukrainian controllers assented.
Then the Malaysians asked to go to 34,000 feet, but were told that that corridor was not available. (The traffic was being directed on what is called the “odd standard” meaning that it was using altitudes with odd numbers, 33,000 or 35,000 feet.)
So the Malaysian 777 remained at 33,000 feet. There were war zone altitude restrictions in place forbidding commercial flights below 32,000 feet, giving Flight 17 the meager margin of 1,000 feet between it and the assumed area of danger. (A third aircraft close by at the time under Ukrainian control, an Airbus A330, was cruising west at 40,000 feet.)
At just after 1.20pm all communication with Flight MH17 was lost.
The Ukrainians called Russian controllers at Rostov to see if they could find it.
The Russians looked at their radar screens and exclaimed, “The target started falling apart.” (There is nothing sinister in the term “target” —it’s the radar term for what is being tracked.)
A little later the Russians told the Ukrainian controllers, “Yes, it’s disappeared.”
This timeline inevitably leaves a tragic “what if?” What if Flight MH17 had climbed to 35,000 feet and the other 777 had remained at 33,000 feet? Would the lower airplane have been the target?
The Dutch report emphasizes that, like other airlines choosing to fly over Ukraine that day, Malaysian Airlines was in full compliance with the then existing rules about flying over war zones. (The FAA prohibited commercial flights over Ukraine 24 hours later.)