Mahkamah dengar rayuan berkait saman salah laku seksual terhadap PM pada 7 April
Mahkamah Rayuan akan mendengar rayuan yang difailkan bekas staf Anwar Ibrahim pada 7 April depan berhubung keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi yang menolak permohonannya bagi membatalkan beberapa perenggan daripada pernyataan pembelaan perdana menteri itu berkait dakwaan serangan seksual yang difailkan pada Julai 2021.
Tarikh itu ditetapkan ketika pengurusan kes semalam, di mana Anwar diwakili Navpreet Singh dan Muhammed Yusoff Rawther diwakili Mahajoth Singh.
Yusoff yang memfailkan saman terhadap Anwar selepas mendakwa diserang secara seksual empat tahun lalu, kini dalam usaha membatalkan beberapa perenggan daripada pernyataan pembelaan Anwar yang dikemukakan pada September 2021.
Beliau menuntut mahkamah membatalkan enam tuduhan yang dibuat dalam oleh Anwar dalam pernyataan pembelaannya , termasuk perkara yang berkait dua individu yang kini sudah meninggal dunia.
Bagaimanapun, pada 9 September, Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur menolak permohonannya dan memerintahkan supaya beliau membayar kos sebanyak RM3,500.
Yusoff memfailkan notis rayuan terhadap keputusan itu pada hari yang sama.
Dalam samannya, Yusoff berkata insiden serangan seksual tersebut berlaku di rumah Anwar yang terletak di Bukit Segambut kira-kira 10 hari sebelum pemimpin PKR itu memenangi Pilihan Raya Kecil Port Dickson pada 13 Oktober 2018.
Beliau memohon pengisytiharan mahkamah bahawa Anwar melakukan serangan seksual terhadapnya, selain menuntut ganti rugi am, teladan dan teruk kerana menyebabkan beliau mengalami trauma dan gangguan fizikal, psikologi dan sosiologi akibat insiden tersebut.
Yusoff pertama kali membuat dakwaan terhadap Anwar dalam satu akuan berkanun pada November 2019, diikuti laporan polis.
Semasa siasatan dijalankan mengikut Seksyen 354 Kanun Keseksaan berkait jenayah mencabul kehormatan, polis menjalankan ujian poligraf selama empat jam di Bukit Aman.
Bagaimanapun, Anwar enggan mengambil ujian tersebut.
Pada 14 Januari 2020, Jabatan Peguam Negara, yang ketika itu diketuai Tommy Thomas, berkata ia tidak akan mendakwa Anwar kerana "bukti yang tidak mencukupi" dan "percanggahan" fakta.
PERTAMA
Hang sebut entot entot lari gwa teringat pada kisah ayah dino.
BalasPadamHang yang mempopularkan istilah tersebut kahkahkah
Itu belum kisah menaajib dan berziana. Amin
Modal sudah ada, pembangkang akan bekerja bersama sama daulah daulah terpilih agar dapat tebuk atap, ini cara politik sejak zaman dahulu kala, peribadi jadi serangan, cerita cerita akan ditukarkan agar diri selamat dari pendakwaan mencuri kekayaan negara, ini MO semua yang sedia ada, kalau tidak nasib mungkin turun naik mahkamah kah kah kah, nak jatuh seseorang sangkut kes sini sana, lihat saja Bossku, ramai curi orang kita, suka mencuri merasuah tetapi cium tangan, ini budaya turun temurun sejak dahulu, direstui cuma perlu berjubah berjanggut sebagai pameran alim ular, kah kah kah, apa pun harap harap lah manusia jadi lebih cerdik sedikit, tak payah cerdik sangat, sikit sudah kah kah kah
BalasPadamLiwat 1 : buang kes, Khairuddin Abu Hasan terkesan tulis Tivoli Apt yg belum bina walaupun tilam dari Tivoli di usung. Ummie Hafilda kata Bapok Tua yg reka dan bayar saksi
BalasPadamLiwat 2 : Atok kata sogokan RM5 juta
Liwat 3 : AG kata NFA, Khatri kena kencing tuntut RM11.5 juta dari Bersatu
https://wrlr.blogspot.com/2022/07/mahathir-dedah-fitnah-anwar.html
MAHATHIR DEDAH FITNAH ANWAR
FITNAH LIWAT DSAI…
PENDAKWARAYA DISOGOK RM5 JUTA
MAHATHIR MOHAMAD BUKA SUARA
at Thursday, July 07, 2022
wrlr.blogspot.com
Berikut yalah verbatim interview Atok Saka dgn Pemberita Indonesia terkini:
Atok : Ya, pihak Mahkamah mendapati Anwar tidak bersalah. Tapi dia buat appeal dan ditukar Pendakwaraya mengambil Pendakwaraya yang private. Sekarang ini kita tahu dilaporkan Pendakwaraya ini dibayar RM5 juta oleh Pemerintah supaya yakinkan Anwar bersalah.
Soal: Mengapa sekarang anda mengeluarkan pendapat ini?
Atok: Kita baru tahu. Tak kan dia nak bagi tahu. Orang lain yang selidik, baru dapat maklumat. Bukan terang2 bagi macam itu
Soal: Jadi anda sekarang menyokong Anwar jadi PM?
Atok: Ya, kalau itu kehendak rakyat dalam sebuah negara demokrasi
Khamis, 7 Julai 2022
HOT HOT HOT - TER KINI TER NOW
SAPA DAPAT
LIMA JUTA $$ ITU ?
JENG JENG JENG
KEELING ISLAM KE?
JENG JENG JENG
BONGKAR BONGKAR
JANGAN
TAK BONGKAR
AMIN
KHALAS
Shafee: Dr M pushed for Najib to appoint me as Anwar prosecutor
BalasPadamPublished: Sep 8, 2018 5:12 PM
⋅
Updated: 8:01 PM
ADS
Lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah claims it was Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad who had pushed for him to be appointed special prosecutor in Anwar Ibrahim's Sodomy II trial.
Shafee claimed that in 2013, then-prime minister Najib Abdul Razak was not keen on appointing him as a prosecutor by way of fiat, as he did not want to offend the attorney-general at the time, Abdul Gani Patail.
"In fact, he was most reluctant.
"However, it was Mahathir who insisted that I be appointed as the special prosecutor in Anwar’s appeals, as Mahathir did not have the confidence that the Attorney-General’s Chambers would be able to competently manage the appeals.
ADS
"This is probably due to the fact that the AGC had lost the Sodomy II case in the High Court," he said in a statement today.
Shafee said this in denying "new information" from the AGC claiming that he had indeed received RM9.5 million from Najib, which coincided with the Sodomy II trial.
The new evidence was submitted by a special task officer to the attorney-general in response to Anwar's appeal against his second sodomy conviction, which he later received a royal pardon for.
Anwar had argued at the Kuala Lumpur High Court that he was denied a fair trial because his prosecutor had received payment from Najib, who was his political rival. The appellate court is set to hear his appeal on Sept 14.
ADS
Meeting with Mahathir
Shafee claimed that in June or July 2013, Mahathir, through lawyer Matthias Chang, had summoned him for a meeting at the Perdana Leadership Foundation.
He said prior to that meeting, Najib had also been summoned to the foundation in Putrajaya, and had been convinced by Mahathir to appoint him special prosecutor.
"I learnt from Chang that my appointment as the special prosecutor was the first of the six demands Mahathir made to Najib at that meeting, for otherwise he would go against Najib.
"Within a matter of days or so, I was communicated by the office of Mahathir and the Prime Minister’s Office that I should meet Gani for the purposes of the appointment, as everything has been agreed to," he said.
Read more: RM9.5m paid by Najib was to settle BN legal fees, says Shafee
Shafee said he had worked for Mahathir numerous times when the latter was Umno president since the early 1990s, representing it and other BN parties in cases ranging from election petitions to litigations.
However, he said most of his work had gone unpaid.
"I have accrued many uncollected bills for my legal work from the days of Mahathir as the prime minister, especially during the period when Mohamed Rahmat was the secretary-general of Umno and BN," he said.
Shafee added this matter had been brought up during a meeting with Najib in Sept 2013, following which the latter agreed to pay him RM9.5 million as a settlement for 46 election petitions Shafee had handled for Umno and BN since the 1990s.